Academic integrity
Stop guessing. Start proving.
AI detectors are a probability with a student’s grade attached. Folio takes a different path: it establishes how the work was written, so integrity is a matter of record, not suspicion.
The detector approach
·Flags honest students on a false positive, with no way to appeal
·Loses to every new paraphrasing tool the next week
·Turns teaching into policing
·Leaves you defending a black-box percentage
The Folio approach
·A verifiable certificate on every submission, not a guess
·The writing process, the sources cited, the AI disclosed
·Honest students are protected, not accused
·Anyone can verify a submission from its public record
Proof of work
The proof travels with the work.
As a student writes in Folio, the platform records the shape of the work: how it was drafted, which sources were actually cited, and where AI assisted, always from the student’s own material, never ghost-written.
Each submission mints an Integrity Certificate with its own public verification page. An instructor, an external examiner, or an honour committee can confirm it in seconds, without trusting a vendor’s score.
thesis-chapter-3.docx
Version timeline
It fits the policy you already have.
Folio doesn’t replace your honour code; it gives it evidence. Where your policy asks students to affirm their work is their own, Folio lets them show it, and gives your committees something they can stand behind on appeal.
Give integrity a foundation of proof.
See how a submission becomes a verifiable record, and what that changes for your students and your committees.